I have two points right away I think are worth considering:
First, you write that “students aren’t reading anymore”. Is that something you are willing to accept? If not, maybe it is worth looking into what can make reading more attractive, for example providing the texts instead of having them buy expensive textbooks, or by working with social annotation (there are plugins that work with Learning Management Systems) so you can scaffold opportunities for students to practice looking for the relevant information; marking what they find most interesting, noteworthy, questionable; asking questions and providing answers to peers; linking to more information; and much more, so that they exercise the skills that might make it more likely that they start reading again.
If you do want to use podcasts, carefully quality check them before recommending them to your students. Rettberg (2026) finds (for one specific software, and at one point in time) that podcasts misunderstand niche-topic texts (which, probably, a lot of our teaching content is) and, by trying to match a typical podcast format, introduce biases and make everything sound mainstream. They also warn that by being whispered to directly into our ears (since we often listen to podcasts on headphones, in contrast to sitting in a lecture theatre or having a radio playing in the background in the kitchen), podcasts might appear more intimate and students might then be less critical of potential bias or misinformation. So it is important that both you and your students are aware that this might potentially be happening.
I do understand the appeal of the idea, though. We experimented with this three years ago and where very positively surprised back then. But I have since become a lot more critical of AI based on all the literature that shows how biased AI models are, and would now be very careful with using them to generate teaching materials.